A remark on ‘4o’

Fact 1: The pair of symbols ‘4o’ does not appear on f1r, its first occurence is on f1v (and it appears only once there).

Fact 2: that first occurence seems to have an overline, as seen here:

Interpretation: That overline seems original, neither a later emendation nor a pen accident. If so, that may mean that ‘4o’ is an abbreviation of a word or even of a whole expression (see e.g. Cappelli’s book on page 14 for examples, but not with ‘4o’), and that the author chose to drop the overline from then on.

Fact 3: The subsequent occurences are on f2r, there are four of them. The first three have nothing particular to them:

But the fourth one has a strange accent: an instinctive stroke of the writer with the same meaning as an overline, or something else? The ‘o’ is also not well closed, bizarre.

On subsequent pages it appears several times without anything unusual.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: